{"id":"W2104770881","doi":"10.1109/tap.2004.842602","title":"Dispersion analysis of the three-dimensional complex envelope ADI-FDTD method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Envelope (radar); Dispersion (optics); Alternating direction implicit method; Bandwidth (computing); Finite difference method; Mathematics; Optics; Mathematical analysis; Computational physics; Physics; Computer science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005098726,0.0002507535,0.0002118086,0.0004889875,0.0003333337,0.0005568587,0.0005575332,0.00057406,0.001320057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002638671,0.0001635073,0.0002408237,0.0003450684,0.0004565049,0.000867618,0.0003508208,0.0005144071,0.0003445658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005075615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001820282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000869519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997203,0.00003919764,0.00001332154,0.0000210279,0.0001909633,0.00001515531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989952,0.000447704,0.00007576644,0.00009437643,0.0003610964,0.00002589268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002579624,0.0001064956,0.00386729,0.0002860257,0.00003874323,0.0003375002,0.0008839587,0.5735406,0.08962256,0.1385777,0.002227562,0.1902537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000512157,0.00001240104,0.0001597048,0.00001203519,0.000003209193,0.00008669999,0.00001634257,0.9873352,0.006607665,0.003094489,0.002657628,0.000009568534],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0299654,0.0003402072,0.9630898,0.000141118,0.00004498499,0.00002317485,0.00003306556,0.0001878539,0.006174522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6442639,0.0007121846,0.3469526,0.00008733163,0.00002721457,0.00007948634,0.0001235793,0.00012364,0.007630128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001820282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004416049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02110547290655013,"score_gpt":0.2723987292708746,"score_spread":0.2512932563643245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}