{"id":"W2104770881","doi":"10.1109/tap.2004.842602","title":"Dispersion analysis of the three-dimensional complex envelope ADI-FDTD method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Envelope (radar); Dispersion (optics); Alternating direction implicit method; Bandwidth (computing); Finite difference method; Mathematics; Optics; Mathematical analysis; Computational physics; Physics; Computer science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001716414,0.0001035182,0.0001736648,0.0001554894,0.0001113901,0.00001106625,0.00005738738,0.00005265298,0.0002941625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000484725,0.00007364327,0.0001140073,0.0006958187,0.00004140803,0.00006367551,8.175427e-7,0.0001243214,0.000003991505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002622997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000076682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001956637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009756358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993067,0.00008118666,0.0002138465,0.0001310933,0.000159468,0.0001077078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996058,0.0001258276,0.0000379571,0.000137888,0.00004796046,0.00004450337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004242632,0.0000657178,0.000179842,0.0000181442,0.0002469789,1.524323e-7,0.0001402277,0.476447,0.1203202,0.00009758303,0.00003479741,0.4024069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002092013,0.00005851829,0.02514224,0.00001345828,0.0002176731,0.000002142808,0.00000794008,0.9457924,0.02798735,0.00004568228,0.0004296775,0.00009369669],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183424,0.00007985953,0.8806702,0.0004013282,0.0000998649,0.0001448465,0.00001149286,0.00005304651,0.0001970096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741403,0.00003541919,0.02555242,0.0001274391,0.00001498592,0.000007897071,0.00000391759,0.00001070511,0.0001068979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8557979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02110547290655013,"score_gpt":0.2723987292708746,"score_spread":0.2512932563643245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}