{"id":"W2104865429","doi":"","title":"What's in a name? The use of the stylistic device metonymy as a strategic manoeuvre in the confrontation and argumentation stages of a discussion.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Trope (literature); Dialectic; Linguistics; Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Philosophy; Metaphor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037091,0.0005718123,0.0007938048,0.001687637,0.006779543,0.007194731,0.001340405,0.003861182,0.004633341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02512946,0.0002924016,0.0007111073,0.00159923,0.01742255,0.02416994,0.005808755,0.004717433,0.001734941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002062672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001554351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007060253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008959037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861041,0.01033321,0.0003965545,0.001182788,0.00145472,0.0005286332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882854,0.006301848,0.001278639,0.001353031,0.001741199,0.00103992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001017102,0.00002470828,0.001441007,0.000201013,0.00004135502,0.0006322421,0.04842407,0.000106145,0.002886568,0.917016,0.008035715,0.02108943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002450275,0.0001724881,0.001571247,0.0006244963,0.00006838702,0.003141501,0.06364664,0.001481893,0.002823444,0.4861216,0.4401885,0.0001353307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.11315,0.01596656,0.3291664,0.1468271,0.01533794,0.000158002,0.0001965988,0.0007608486,0.3784366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466126,0.002051399,0.03011405,0.006000016,0.001618655,0.00009449031,0.00006089988,0.0003267553,0.01312122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01037091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0548473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04590201802108552,"score_gpt":0.31809527890544,"score_spread":0.2721932608843545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}