{"id":"W2104865429","doi":"","title":"What's in a name? The use of the stylistic device metonymy as a strategic manoeuvre in the confrontation and argumentation stages of a discussion.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Trope (literature); Dialectic; Linguistics; Epistemology; Rhetorical device; Philosophy; Metaphor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000379507,0.00009089621,0.0001240105,0.00006570428,0.00004020644,0.00007604141,0.0001206199,0.00005109566,0.0002869939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002737646,0.00003430515,0.00003595123,0.0002432798,0.0001002917,0.0002576637,0.00001592243,0.0001062332,0.000004457341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001408661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002301039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006802535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01242427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.0005822289,0.0003019849,0.0001472619,0.0001865147,0.0001107337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992799,0.0002912308,0.0001667062,0.0002142234,0.00003939639,0.000008570099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009442226,0.002057369,0.1107187,0.000289954,0.0002148326,0.00005185873,0.1684196,0.0003649104,0.01045539,0.6657937,0.001053146,0.03963626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001690322,0.0001354644,0.6884776,0.0001228211,0.0001216429,0.00001652948,0.2851254,0.0002139111,0.0007504724,0.02290768,0.0003112707,0.0001268721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932674,0.0004107652,0.0001041392,0.001037762,0.00009208789,0.0005562195,0.000009621202,0.000005110597,0.004516877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980524,0.00003773822,0.00006353501,0.0003894523,0.00001340518,0.00006463157,0.00002051108,0.000006107502,0.001352286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.642886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04590201802108552,"score_gpt":0.31809527890544,"score_spread":0.2721932608843545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}