{"id":"W2104894411","doi":"10.1002/pds.3741","title":"Treatment with rivastigmine or galantamine and risk of urinary incontinence: results from a Dutch database study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Top Institute Pharma; Novo Nordisk; College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen; Universiteit Utrecht","keywords":"Medicine; Galantamine; Rivastigmine; Hazard ratio; Incidence (geometry); Urinary incontinence; Cohort; Medical prescription; Cohort study; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Dementia; Surgery; Disease; Pharmacology; Donepezil","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002047765,0.0003112309,0.001018984,0.0009498996,0.0002368303,0.001067,0.0006699973,0.0005274008,0.002230929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008490026,0.0003792692,0.001663831,0.003570858,0.0002123331,0.0006136619,0.0005546628,0.000256706,0.0003234498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001074139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009508804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05354604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06032548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975152,0.0009635914,0.000500511,0.0004919596,0.0003794143,0.0001493295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936526,0.001747713,0.003059836,0.0005783823,0.0006171687,0.0003443053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001513962,0.00009556306,0.9897927,0.0004037092,0.002174452,0.0002797322,0.0002346149,0.0001468098,0.0003005656,0.00006200748,0.001106988,0.003888984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002787966,0.00008600091,0.9966203,0.00007570116,0.0007377792,0.0003452868,0.0001974836,0.0004300259,0.00007035274,0.00002820132,0.001115086,0.00001494908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981121,0.002208956,0.000282523,0.0001341455,0.0000114656,0.00007906913,0.01535383,0.000005032633,0.0008039583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826488,0.001435894,0.0004291931,0.0001371751,0.00001437627,0.0001442198,0.01471296,0.0000160206,0.0004613222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05354604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1064687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07677793389942834,"score_gpt":0.3837309418148767,"score_spread":0.3069530079154484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}