{"id":"W2104894411","doi":"10.1002/pds.3741","title":"Treatment with rivastigmine or galantamine and risk of urinary incontinence: results from a Dutch database study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Top Institute Pharma; Novo Nordisk; College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen; Universiteit Utrecht","keywords":"Medicine; Galantamine; Rivastigmine; Hazard ratio; Incidence (geometry); Urinary incontinence; Cohort; Medical prescription; Cohort study; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Dementia; Surgery; Disease; Pharmacology; Donepezil","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251341,0.0002534802,0.0007846619,0.000105564,0.0001043396,0.000003673677,0.00007399711,0.00005802169,0.00005833681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008704886,0.000142356,0.00003267344,0.0001570861,0.00033167,0.0001075038,0.0001639168,0.0003096707,0.000005111604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003364579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001866442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00501684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002134747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971333,0.001240968,0.0005717709,0.0005522036,0.0001773835,0.0003243624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956972,0.003189908,0.0001937795,0.0003481641,0.00011582,0.0004551076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07838076,0.001613934,0.9055062,0.00005676834,0.0007177063,0.0009263052,0.00353091,0.00000657857,0.000264424,0.000003194435,0.001639095,0.00735411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07294581,0.02099403,0.8828014,0.0001632624,0.001866646,0.001149632,0.003840142,0.0031941,0.001145512,0.00007689107,0.01143013,0.0003924832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919558,0.002962368,0.0001001837,0.002458969,0.00005065655,0.0008922532,0.001082361,0.00003307265,0.0004642909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844129,0.01274173,0.001317071,0.00008400943,0.0001500323,0.0000404902,0.0003853551,0.0000160233,0.0008523759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02270485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07677793389942834,"score_gpt":0.3837309418148767,"score_spread":0.3069530079154484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}