{"id":"W2104936679","doi":"10.1002/anie.200901317","title":"Chemoselectivity and the Curious Reactivity Preferences of Functional Groups","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angewandte Chemie International Edition","topic":"Chemical Synthesis and Analysis","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":320,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Chemoselectivity; Categorization; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Key (lock); Management science; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001705859,0.00008243453,0.0001098818,0.0000195558,0.00004443284,0.00001732833,0.00009328869,0.00006898587,0.0000503392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001909709,0.00005858151,0.00009014301,0.00005202967,0.000119584,0.0000114813,0.00003171197,0.00006620057,8.465268e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001308896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001506307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002473558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001129319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994124,0.00001873126,0.0001308519,0.0001860284,0.0001773871,0.00007458694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996136,0.00004692965,0.0001047242,0.00009959277,0.0001089412,0.00002622938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002206621,0.0001108399,0.0003626322,0.000003243184,0.00006289678,1.854561e-7,0.00001876854,0.000003211626,0.9905017,0.0003935075,0.002207689,0.006114672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197057,0.00003549747,0.008655193,0.000009158199,0.00002625325,0.00000746863,0.00001611419,0.00005988981,0.9836814,0.004433602,0.002485937,0.00006979879],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893877,0.0002179694,0.002921631,0.001932155,0.000129527,0.00006094794,0.00002505325,0.000007845024,0.00531716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984987,0.0002546118,0.00003725849,0.0001887519,0.0006917418,0.000009641397,0.0001925225,0.00000330288,0.000123491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009110967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2388885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009104687644575619,"score_gpt":0.2302611133610994,"score_spread":0.2211564257165238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}