{"id":"W2105080966","doi":"10.1190/1.3295745","title":"3D stochastic inversion of gravity data using cokriging and cosimulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Continental (Canada); Polytechnique Montréal; Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Polytechnique Montréal","keywords":"Inversion (geology); Gravity anomaly; Geology; Covariance; Residual; A priori and a posteriori; Geostatistics; Covariance matrix; Geodesy; Algorithm; Computer science; Geomorphology; Mathematics; Statistics; Petroleum engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000382258,0.0004735547,0.0003947616,0.0005627989,0.0002733922,0.0004025297,0.0003676313,0.0003309434,0.0007221802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001296359,0.0002621269,0.0004867282,0.0007253371,0.0004276985,0.000317895,0.0004436348,0.0003821299,0.0001607086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006191499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001194859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04086827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03236882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999773,0.00008320522,0.00001110263,0.00003633951,0.00006974115,0.0000267327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996085,0.0002004309,0.00005031324,0.00004401619,0.00008160752,0.00001520161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004677896,0.0000265107,0.002114066,0.0000275958,0.00002860817,0.00003991681,0.00005111177,0.9568609,0.005781535,0.003336919,0.0001725886,0.03151358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003906409,0.000004962978,0.0003083712,0.000001176432,0.000001638525,0.00000754548,0.000003660986,0.9983139,0.0008512551,0.0003206707,0.0001792677,0.000003635809],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.135284,0.00004758824,0.8626953,0.00007676783,0.00001663041,0.00002948369,0.00009060353,0.0006778719,0.001081796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7901614,0.0000570622,0.2089006,0.00001779154,0.000008555074,0.00004963866,0.0001602154,0.00006076917,0.0005838785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04086827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0812608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03916240853975564,"score_gpt":0.2777638740728687,"score_spread":0.2386014655331131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}