{"id":"W2105148141","doi":"10.1177/1094428104263674","title":"Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Personality; Sample (material); Social psychology; Test (biology); Item response theory; Personality test; Big Five personality traits; Class (philosophy); Response bias; Econometrics; Psychometrics; Test validity; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1046289,0.0009971609,0.001988944,0.003880711,0.001999011,0.002659803,0.00277421,0.00298871,0.001642051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2421552,0.001107172,0.002594939,0.002500153,0.002275639,0.002408276,0.003318096,0.002250019,0.0006053754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001213222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009197565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007091275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007777791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9054263,0.0682866,0.007880813,0.009247226,0.008188999,0.0009700635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6767423,0.227659,0.01616612,0.06594512,0.01216872,0.00131875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00673048,0.007183969,0.5460377,0.001764507,0.004251049,0.0009119915,0.01883309,0.0184473,0.02197007,0.02484653,0.005421801,0.3436016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002039104,0.007675469,0.444633,0.00050388,0.001981845,0.002504077,0.006503418,0.4016004,0.03626978,0.08241113,0.01316999,0.0007078084],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5412762,0.0003341911,0.447825,0.0004922473,0.0001455573,0.006069572,0.001546583,0.0008564906,0.001454127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.718968,0.000076802,0.2671035,0.000404486,0.00008275996,0.009816326,0.003008012,0.0001265692,0.0004133364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5533372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5198422274660762,"score_gpt":0.5916335378818836,"score_spread":0.07179131041580733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}