{"id":"W2105307775","doi":"10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1880:esmobf>2.0.co;2","title":"Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Barotropic Flow over Finite Topography","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Barotropic fluid; Enstrophy; Inviscid flow; Eddy; Vorticity; Stream function; Amplitude; Statistical mechanics; Potential vorticity; Entropy (arrow of time); Physics; Mechanics; Classical mechanics; Geology; Statistical physics; Turbulence; Vortex; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002245652,0.0002408297,0.0005681243,0.0001920071,0.00006023015,0.00004668945,0.0004233398,0.00007946615,0.0007015985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001030487,0.0001760697,0.000587898,0.001570615,0.0002181327,0.0004676277,0.00001906383,0.0003447432,0.00000929447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002086988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007588077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001815202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001019978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979554,0.00008801906,0.0006194895,0.0002037086,0.0007376104,0.0003957775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981797,0.0004788408,0.0006248858,0.0001931074,0.0002232506,0.0003002346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005481116,0.0005727939,0.955608,0.0001508351,0.0004288715,0.0001620087,0.0003383539,0.007714876,0.0003759983,0.002150689,0.001980851,0.02996865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003044735,0.00684838,0.7170215,0.0003311199,0.000603934,0.0001520102,0.0004854708,0.1485447,0.0009888728,0.1083855,0.01254702,0.001046635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791476,0.001087319,0.01784525,0.00009770443,0.0003712267,0.00009388141,0.00009336952,0.0000250962,0.001238566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937544,0.0003180308,0.005323492,0.0001491005,0.0004231916,1.579343e-7,0.00001387684,0.000008414986,0.000009289865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2385864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7682012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008111783847214745,"score_gpt":0.217638723010894,"score_spread":0.2095269391636793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}