{"id":"W2105456799","doi":"10.1109/tpwrd.2006.874106","title":"A Simple Energy Operator Computational Method for Voltage Flicker Assessment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","topic":"Power Quality and Harmonics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Envelope (radar); Waveform; Energy (signal processing); Voltage; Energy operator; Flicker; Operator (biology); Computer science; Algorithm; SIGNAL (programming language); Electronic engineering; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Telecommunications; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004697906,0.0005918228,0.0004087505,0.0008597719,0.0003725347,0.0006512059,0.0008306385,0.0005337315,0.006667813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002090705,0.0001704112,0.0003433363,0.0005791258,0.0004105414,0.001211719,0.0006076877,0.0007411551,0.001342133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002967963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005544213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007618382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995685,0.00006791255,0.000025983,0.00006767495,0.0002526788,0.00001719479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995153,0.0001727462,0.00003629649,0.00008640708,0.0001665899,0.00002266587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001857978,0.0001134154,0.0007008755,0.0001875008,0.00004965372,0.0001310295,0.0001142385,0.06416555,0.07723521,0.05820979,0.003386915,0.79552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003993908,0.0001306049,0.0005491952,0.00001767391,0.00001667267,0.0002935251,0.00002531299,0.9479389,0.02336285,0.01410305,0.0134808,0.0000413815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001098628,0.00002386308,0.998007,0.00001259774,0.00002541712,0.00002172543,0.000007731584,0.0002313263,0.0005717344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07923108,0.00008051455,0.9173629,0.00004807881,0.00004686105,0.0001090738,0.0000726012,0.0001455372,0.002903468],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006667813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02230608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01483570379588695,"score_gpt":0.2716196576669714,"score_spread":0.2567839538710845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}