{"id":"W2105530144","doi":"10.1103/physreve.62.2797","title":"Nonlinear-resonance analysis of halo formation excited by beam-core oscillation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics","topic":"Particle accelerators and beam dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"TRIUMF","keywords":"Halo; Resonance (particle physics); Physics; Beam (structure); Oscillation (cell signaling); Nonlinear system; Nonlinear resonance; Harmonic; Computational physics; Thermal emittance; Harmonics; Atomic physics; Optics; Astrophysics; Quantum mechanics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000940566,0.0002958764,0.0007457757,0.00005965271,0.0001172691,0.00003096613,0.0001524187,0.00009715702,0.0001053579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002889723,0.0002592768,0.0001936196,0.0006235331,0.0001717098,0.0003393682,0.00007871799,0.0003176563,0.00003390896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006102678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007687308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004641962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983415,0.00004140717,0.0007125789,0.0003163807,0.000275802,0.0003123168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.000154315,0.0000876175,0.0002848957,0.00008503299,0.0001544496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002732393,0.002527318,0.003382839,0.005639732,0.003406456,0.00005018082,0.004141462,0.04855945,0.022126,0.03851013,0.03675604,0.8346272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003069351,0.0001454206,0.003092905,0.0003322102,0.0007957865,0.000003216211,0.0000180884,0.9816132,0.0008303267,0.01069125,0.001839614,0.00033101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972722,0.004737208,0.0184773,0.0001821059,0.0001635673,0.0003736321,0.0008024656,0.0001535916,0.002388146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891014,0.008543422,0.0007308985,0.00006373753,0.0001412189,0.00002074821,0.00115236,0.00003753705,0.0002087382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01000689916468145,"score_gpt":0.2830731824180336,"score_spread":0.2730662832533521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}