{"id":"W2105616020","doi":"10.1186/s13643-015-0015-5","title":"Effectiveness and economic evaluation of chiropractic care for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review protocol","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Chiropractic; Medicine; Economic evaluation; Checklist; Randomized controlled trial; Low back pain; Systematic review; Health care; Cost effectiveness; Alternative medicine; Physical therapy; Protocol (science); MEDLINE; Data extraction; Surgery; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03493882,0.0006111946,0.01291872,0.0001263467,0.00004551632,0.00001500555,0.0001716185,0.0001902991,0.00002675136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008517622,0.0002429667,0.001933864,0.0001982823,0.00008055429,0.00005469175,0.0000163041,0.00008565922,0.0000547465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009323744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006857699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001072258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004007806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791377,0.01505318,0.004622569,0.0004411892,0.000576596,0.0001688239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867079,0.00540034,0.005534267,0.001493819,0.0007680274,0.00009564358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009266054,0.0001058829,4.939251e-7,0.9332685,0.0006757644,8.901404e-8,0.0002427891,4.181767e-7,1.736589e-7,0.00001343296,0.0000525233,0.06563059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103529,0.001180904,0.000001346757,0.9185442,0.02228682,0.00002125642,0.0001256879,0.0001565077,2.630652e-7,0.000008666021,0.05646762,0.000171396],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[3.316977e-7,0.5294083,0.00004008977,0.000006297799,0.00005889338,0.4704272,0.00001172619,0.000003890517,0.00004324993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002176792,0.5311348,0.00008024822,0.000004478715,0.00003301671,0.4686566,0.00003320874,0.00002928337,0.00002615439],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06545919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1076873159899726,"score_gpt":0.4528661047039653,"score_spread":0.3451787887139928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}