{"id":"W2105717803","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.008","title":"Alternative approaches to dealing with respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparative analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Respondent; Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Certainty; Payment card; Econometrics; Valuation (finance); Payment; Actuarial science; Point estimation; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06538609,0.001135,0.002159168,0.004038881,0.001678584,0.009165148,0.006384919,0.004061032,0.01362504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1913542,0.0009664494,0.004263183,0.008591064,0.005622075,0.01406034,0.004660639,0.004406355,0.0005230478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003666857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002350553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004206009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003751422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9474728,0.04500043,0.00097026,0.001624889,0.003712109,0.001219473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6723133,0.3070539,0.005033156,0.008997592,0.005629792,0.0009722307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005718834,0.0003336051,0.008276412,0.0004784603,0.0005959715,0.0002033115,0.002972055,0.0381553,0.0002062219,0.8757339,0.001507869,0.070965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001925068,0.00040779,0.008087705,0.0002950159,0.000790875,0.0004160421,0.00340162,0.2454934,0.0004335477,0.7358019,0.004533126,0.0001464739],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2068876,0.006390806,0.7578053,0.005330668,0.0002049367,0.0004709213,0.0003593209,0.00008486011,0.0224656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8810056,0.003518322,0.1106743,0.0003706572,0.0003190332,0.0003911446,0.0002784194,0.00006584157,0.003376551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06538609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3457989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3391467352203044,"score_gpt":0.2403769887426893,"score_spread":0.09876974647761508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}