{"id":"W2105832903","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.016","title":"Relative risk and odds ratio data are still portrayed with inappropriate scales in the medical literature","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds ratio; Reciprocal; Relative risk; Confidence interval; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Odds; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2846206,0.002699887,0.01052205,0.02563587,0.001594043,0.01266639,0.007932089,0.006935101,0.004062043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7676745,0.002290186,0.005781395,0.03211996,0.01515878,0.01289344,0.006019298,0.01508603,0.002030621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002867307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003120228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002610006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003365763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5039603,0.3548411,0.08508088,0.01246548,0.04267109,0.0009811951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1281192,0.8106208,0.02659015,0.01871074,0.01503383,0.0009252309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002067898,0.0002134156,0.01313376,0.1071185,0.02215464,0.0006740504,0.00675351,0.003803291,0.001430298,0.1831787,0.1962933,0.4631786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134364,0.0007921368,0.01399263,0.06608755,0.01507371,0.002619335,0.005555044,0.007571229,0.002069034,0.6146219,0.2694951,0.0009879076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008435718,0.5603426,0.2205852,0.1628035,0.03061828,0.0005226564,0.005232379,0.001404929,0.01005482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.238503,0.1815068,0.3337206,0.1870093,0.04878442,0.003074857,0.002664238,0.002346334,0.002390431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7153795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8821902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8102461535365199,"score_gpt":0.6332432112797253,"score_spread":0.1770029422567946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}