{"id":"W2105971748","doi":"10.1109/robot.2006.1642347","title":"Kinematic and static analysis of a planar modular 2-DoF tensegrity mechanism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Statics; Modular design; Kinematics; Workspace; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Planar; Flexibility (engineering); Static analysis; Structural engineering; Mechanism design; Robot; Topology (electrical circuits); Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004323095,0.00007323143,0.0002367669,0.0001944332,0.00001606008,0.00001151646,0.00003133866,0.00002759875,0.0001397248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000493204,0.00005553827,0.00006131781,0.0004750899,0.00000957714,0.00004407629,0.000004755218,0.00002570426,7.991529e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009288712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001305322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002811628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001699895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995438,0.000008017497,0.0001962997,0.00007887255,0.00009690953,0.0000760365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998108,0.00001939314,0.0000276927,0.00009720017,0.00002446354,0.00002050299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001209034,0.000007078302,0.001431508,0.00006795704,0.0006014483,0.000001385544,0.00005044328,0.977846,0.007746186,0.01196818,0.00007326118,0.0002053232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007769463,0.000005883849,0.02496173,0.000003587617,0.0007465348,6.011935e-7,0.00003334557,0.9677564,0.001450119,0.004891452,0.000002807071,0.00006982457],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7962058,0.00007039522,0.2029475,0.0000195885,0.00001177558,0.0000450509,0.000009687331,0.0000513374,0.0006388673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819344,0.00002070593,0.01791271,0.000009142247,0.000006666495,0.000001737807,0.00004066512,0.000005365769,0.00006858904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1857286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2264785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00322243873049325,"score_gpt":0.1649211603127447,"score_spread":0.1616987215822515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}