{"id":"W2106163222","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3035","title":"The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Epistemology; Informal logic; Adversary; Authoritarianism; Fallacy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176318,0.00007204034,0.00007228063,0.00002474182,0.0001733077,0.00002907401,0.0002694507,0.00007881838,0.0002441351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552897,0.00003423907,0.000065511,0.0001363713,0.00008017499,0.00006581913,0.00006097015,0.0001919489,0.0001456783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009755502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000275137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006222592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006323905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991599,0.0000863358,0.0001966551,0.00008883222,0.0002984156,0.0001699007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993562,0.00005304681,0.00009380183,0.0003428963,0.0001227022,0.00003134941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049113,0.000309832,0.004066618,0.00002426894,0.0001111986,4.994923e-7,0.02711718,0.00008381355,0.003045819,0.7248321,0.004949422,0.2352543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001623477,0.0004014098,0.8270697,0.00001241515,0.000206413,0.00005157074,0.01924385,0.001177911,0.005371121,0.03135528,0.1130586,0.0004282923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6026598,0.00004937812,0.0002641369,0.0002863984,0.001087603,0.0004377581,0.000005495845,0.00001756997,0.3951919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977251,0.000001581495,0.000193612,0.000439272,0.0001044815,0.000119021,0.00000750819,0.000003196818,0.001406176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8230031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04146375886973361,"score_gpt":0.3193228806160212,"score_spread":0.2778591217462875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}