{"id":"W2106303555","doi":"10.18433/j3z88f","title":"Sample Sizes for Designing Bioequivalence Studies for Highly Variable Drugs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Sample (material); Bioequivalence; Statistics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Econometrics; Variable (mathematics); Mathematics; Point (geometry); Variation (astronomy); Medicine; Chemistry; Pharmacology; Physics; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485375,0.0002877729,0.0009610339,0.0001652264,0.0004539125,0.00008777326,0.00103729,0.00006737327,0.0004622144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1067944,0.0001984737,0.0003898173,0.0005148182,0.001147466,0.0005032512,0.0001456807,0.0003395454,0.000003984725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008503288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003006737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006689657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.542397e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956669,0.0005857802,0.001775362,0.000421002,0.0007850621,0.000765924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8767915,0.1207433,0.0009623321,0.0001528412,0.0009160981,0.0004339968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004972018,0.001745012,0.001187449,0.002035398,0.00134889,0.00002481526,0.003317021,0.00003515958,0.07435637,0.6499326,0.01934109,0.2417042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003277394,0.0007932454,0.000007891195,0.0001607595,0.0007682527,0.00001766132,0.0005414601,0.003201185,0.1340686,0.8366232,0.02026572,0.000274621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009232308,0.001719752,0.9826112,0.001327353,0.003145935,0.001123827,0.0001338086,0.00006149626,0.0006443437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07441337,0.0006193291,0.9231811,0.0007448224,0.0009075901,0.00006714734,1.530257e-7,0.00002640849,0.0000400563],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2414295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9007295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8718751607281915,"score_gpt":0.6628438347039814,"score_spread":0.20903132602421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}