{"id":"W2106310544","doi":"10.1109/pac.1993.308756","title":"Cavity RF mode analysis using a boundary-integral method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Matrix (chemical analysis); Mathematical analysis; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Integral equation; Magnetic field; Finite element method; Boundary value problem; Surface (topology); Physics; Radio frequency; Boundary (topology); Mathematics; Materials science; Geometry; Quantum mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005640747,0.0005080131,0.000836663,0.0008532095,0.0006158905,0.000875899,0.001436769,0.000960336,0.00764417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001079741,0.0003740972,0.0007726023,0.0003839288,0.0005734387,0.00111931,0.0009083486,0.001035069,0.002396486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005982381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00127226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002365318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001681642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997471,0.00004590499,0.000008568509,0.00003101694,0.0001417577,0.00002569355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996345,0.0001266895,0.00002013766,0.00004868011,0.0001468231,0.00002320692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008365388,0.00009119257,0.0005609525,0.0002295563,0.00005086287,0.0002213113,0.0003949648,0.492348,0.06835404,0.2706137,0.006162866,0.1608889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008871802,0.000009294341,0.00006435544,0.00001269538,0.000003508941,0.00004304091,0.00001166341,0.9814728,0.002591703,0.0111104,0.004660326,0.00001145874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002539322,0.00006229205,0.9924555,0.00004571016,0.00002880073,0.00002339731,0.00003433836,0.0003620893,0.004448614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1266259,0.0002149085,0.8628479,0.00009176928,0.00004608754,0.0002304819,0.0001616831,0.0005860438,0.009195185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00764417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0255723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872298721299602,"score_gpt":0.3003182808440707,"score_spread":0.2815952936310747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}