{"id":"W2106404693","doi":"10.1023/a:1004161928957","title":"Estimating phytoplankton carbon from microscopic counts: an application for riverine systems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrobiologia","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Phytoplankton; Algae; Total organic carbon; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Ecology; Sampling (signal processing); Taxon; Primary producers; Aquatic plant; Oceanography; Biology; Nutrient; Mathematics; Macrophyte; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009587955,0.00009024727,0.000122143,0.000006354798,0.00005889449,0.00001519703,0.0001272974,0.00006151962,0.0005315687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004580243,0.00007828095,0.00001843445,0.00004124597,0.00003536385,0.00004246857,0.00001456931,0.00004355066,0.0004149695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006613519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004337212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001238863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994199,0.00002117016,0.0001506674,0.0002243788,0.00004637095,0.0001375241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.00003184754,0.0000619976,0.0002029307,0.000003187309,0.00003404771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001572069,0.0004530637,0.4333645,0.0002791686,0.0001215754,0.00001112045,0.0009469765,0.226877,0.2100348,0.00131949,0.00721648,0.1192186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002469158,0.00008605804,0.004809126,0.00002632524,0.00001280734,0.00000531092,0.00001188359,0.9634652,0.0002856345,0.0003931437,0.0304613,0.0001963676],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875128,0.00004902645,0.003381203,0.000005798729,0.0002357051,0.0003681694,0.0001255548,0.00005894594,0.008262804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955389,0.000003572694,0.003327716,0.00003302494,0.0001241961,0.00006940632,0.0002915545,0.000009836157,0.0006017396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7365881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006841620990199202,"score_gpt":0.224112229940183,"score_spread":0.2172706089499838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}