{"id":"W2106424973","doi":"10.1080/0020717042000267723","title":"Reducing conservatism in the design of a robust gain-scheduled controller for non-linear chemical processes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Control","topic":"Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Conservatism; Robust control; Controller (irrigation); Lyapunov function; Mathematics; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Control (management); Mathematical optimization; Control engineering; Engineering; Control system; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051393,0.000129552,0.0004054158,0.0001267814,0.00001629413,0.0000345899,0.0004957058,0.00007321445,0.000006038943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009027572,0.00009265246,0.0001485887,0.0001005964,0.00004956432,0.0001701296,0.000005803847,0.0001886128,9.666544e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001170034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002317637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002408339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007420462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984905,0.00005173491,0.000803994,0.00008637129,0.0004075466,0.0001599289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975426,0.001243795,0.0002728332,0.00008491898,0.0008177822,0.00003811866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001366471,0.0001277537,0.0002506207,0.00007541871,0.0004077367,0.00002041842,0.001295088,0.9574369,0.03746673,0.0005246933,0.0001225017,0.0009056464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07494046,0.0007502117,0.001761497,0.001805419,0.0002690117,0.0004704022,0.001539827,0.8803729,0.02611412,0.01050632,0.000902824,0.0005669651],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1305844,0.0007155996,0.864929,0.002546341,0.0004744235,0.0006365445,0.00001960146,0.00001203981,0.00008194755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949929,0.00002359849,0.004216526,0.0002601418,0.0004304166,0.00005783611,0.000001224831,0.0000143074,0.000003097034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3778258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0245960663473032,"score_gpt":0.2546078579553789,"score_spread":0.2300117916080757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}