{"id":"W2106446269","doi":"10.5558/tfc81683-5","title":"Climate change implications for stand yields and soil expectation values: A northern Saskatchewan case study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada)","funders":"Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental science; Productivity; Ecosystem; Yield (engineering); Offset (computer science); Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography; Climatology; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002126257,0.0001050661,0.00009346467,0.000006813821,0.0004871293,0.00005979344,0.0001428682,0.00004928933,0.00001832886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000182086,0.00003888919,0.00003673258,0.0001234624,0.00004976207,0.0001340589,0.00005454493,0.00007106917,0.00000761844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004746182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001656724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007852691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05787697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992588,0.00005594943,0.0001409665,0.0002027558,0.00007420462,0.0002673695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.0002773588,0.00006638432,0.00009326973,0.00003897651,0.00005853963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000638452,0.0009822764,0.1297761,0.00004027042,0.0001166595,0.00008267797,0.02784301,0.0001748323,0.07910551,0.0003037801,0.0005925284,0.760344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002299444,0.003104086,0.8903902,0.00005938455,0.0002110981,0.001939032,0.0873513,0.00454661,0.003581509,0.001418471,0.004330397,0.0007684369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958597,0.0004553715,0.000005240449,0.00257381,0.00001747423,0.0008095796,0.0001690798,0.00006641739,0.00004333764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991887,0.00003853806,0.00002231446,0.00009903342,0.0002796178,0.000281564,0.000023098,0.000001683263,0.00006549429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7606142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03802617566567533,"score_gpt":0.2704843223053417,"score_spread":0.2324581466396664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}