{"id":"W2106446269","doi":"10.5558/tfc81683-5","title":"Climate change implications for stand yields and soil expectation values: A northern Saskatchewan case study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada)","funders":"Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental science; Productivity; Ecosystem; Yield (engineering); Offset (computer science); Agroforestry; Forestry; Geography; Climatology; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003783116,0.0003325104,0.0002321738,0.0004636138,0.000938478,0.0009933269,0.0005392486,0.0005489606,0.00228462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008047183,0.0001744264,0.0004459488,0.001508847,0.0006437694,0.0003937959,0.0006021954,0.0004812491,0.0001344831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01024276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004185568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7521201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9204118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.00006539519,0.000007956818,0.00002003528,0.00002245215,0.00007246366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995083,0.000247965,0.00005133107,0.00003476097,0.0001005949,0.00005711571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004041119,0.0002823146,0.7901809,0.00007459239,0.0003429694,0.005978328,0.0009554625,0.1671558,0.004914802,0.005378466,0.003264299,0.02106791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001457963,0.0002155643,0.7755625,0.0000781385,0.0002483071,0.000912422,0.006931395,0.1993851,0.002820575,0.006599601,0.006963599,0.0001370786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961851,0.00006433472,0.0002598001,0.0001823171,0.000002403129,0.00001541297,0.0004713451,0.000007849901,0.002811364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981695,0.00009559716,0.0003058283,0.00004767104,0.000001225229,0.00001424913,0.0001977376,0.000003218699,0.001164951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2478799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4986793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03802617566567533,"score_gpt":0.2704843223053417,"score_spread":0.2324581466396664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}