{"id":"W2106551902","doi":"10.1109/cmpsac.1997.625028","title":"A method for structural compatibility in software reuse using requirements specification","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reuse; Compatibility (geochemistry); Software construction; Software engineering; Component-based software engineering; Software requirements specification; Software development; Formal specification; Formal methods; Notation; Programming language; Software; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000660805,0.0001247389,0.0001872266,0.0001073837,0.00006137014,0.00004413146,0.0007745054,0.000050671,0.00001389804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001843317,0.0001168665,0.00004305496,0.0003348487,0.00002015348,0.0005755347,0.0002137077,0.00008961058,0.000002736489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000087915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002351812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008453299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987506,0.0001384981,0.0002924181,0.0004158927,0.0001467567,0.0002558693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998049,0.000874627,0.00007685961,0.0008872438,0.00007224792,0.00004004859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000280288,0.0001049162,0.01158297,0.0001728857,0.00002901608,0.000007975734,0.003740086,0.5276998,0.01278037,0.01660632,0.0005292959,0.4267183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003945659,0.00003819108,0.00753133,0.00001703732,0.000002575363,0.000005802327,0.00002164822,0.9190496,0.004313131,0.0682105,0.0001962168,0.0002193733],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01976308,0.00007566319,0.9790978,0.0001012374,0.0002338178,0.0003182074,0.000002138651,0.0003916186,0.00001639469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03495547,0.000003345197,0.9649028,0.00004692869,0.00002509031,0.00001643,0.000001407364,0.000009151436,0.00003936746],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4264989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2371158841216838,"score_gpt":0.3970252536668944,"score_spread":0.1599093695452106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}