{"id":"W2106551902","doi":"10.1109/cmpsac.1997.625028","title":"A method for structural compatibility in software reuse using requirements specification","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reuse; Compatibility (geochemistry); Software construction; Software engineering; Component-based software engineering; Software requirements specification; Software development; Formal specification; Formal methods; Notation; Programming language; Software; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01967486,0.002097756,0.001364535,0.005445082,0.002229564,0.003323924,0.003446309,0.003999511,0.007668001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04713778,0.001884621,0.003667646,0.002733137,0.006283307,0.007842639,0.004910096,0.006067846,0.003614958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002019043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001653958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9731313,0.0106227,0.002743866,0.003217313,0.009667192,0.0006175775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606941,0.02492225,0.001536106,0.00571904,0.006687102,0.0004412976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001782047,0.0002828384,0.0007594346,0.0008741868,0.0001683712,0.0007413529,0.002737439,0.009266806,0.01233037,0.5940688,0.008087313,0.3705048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009218685,0.000754935,0.0008268101,0.001059801,0.0004050101,0.00345184,0.0006915398,0.1659798,0.06856185,0.4874853,0.2692328,0.0006284721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003976099,0.00003016753,0.9976115,0.0001435922,0.00004411457,0.0001564506,0.00001593348,0.0005224782,0.00107817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006539201,0.00005990459,0.9913099,0.0001064462,0.00003104995,0.0004785902,0.00005577016,0.000208858,0.001210299],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01967486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1040519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2371158841216838,"score_gpt":0.3970252536668944,"score_spread":0.1599093695452106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}