{"id":"W2106553525","doi":"10.1016/s0010-440x(00)90148-2","title":"The catatonia rating scale I—Development, reliability, and use","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comprehensive Psychiatry","topic":"Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Intraclass correlation; Cronbach's alpha; Catatonia; Inter-rater reliability; Rating scale; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107249,0.0002021465,0.0002683233,0.00003266591,0.0006751014,0.00005602717,0.00009977187,0.00005191201,0.00006157585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003709772,0.000139922,0.000056397,0.0001531473,0.000285903,0.00008645194,0.00005496687,0.0002596771,0.00007005619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003947845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001280142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002082281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008760663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987477,0.00007134176,0.0002998892,0.0003449887,0.0001866415,0.0003494568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989372,0.0002713864,0.00006202122,0.0004142877,0.0002065061,0.0001085692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001033916,0.0002487677,0.8859276,0.0002385378,0.0004151612,0.000009169436,0.002708346,0.00000852624,0.005722851,0.0003754222,0.02879512,0.07451662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001629274,0.0002335893,0.8181345,0.0001240138,0.00006609065,0.00012247,0.0005850462,0.00004225826,0.0009513004,0.0008620563,0.1769964,0.0002529336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98401,0.007559403,0.00001534628,0.006307088,0.0002497665,0.0004881018,0.000002004611,0.00008889065,0.001279342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637715,0.003474218,0.0178801,0.007178599,0.0004253084,0.0001020632,0.0000189929,0.00007640143,0.007072832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1482013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5705853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01546749534910191,"score_gpt":0.2758898150479691,"score_spread":0.2604223196988672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}