{"id":"W2106602701","doi":"10.1002/cjce.21952","title":"Comparison between numerical results and PIV experimental data for gas–solid flow in ducts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina","keywords":"Turbulence; Inviscid flow; Mechanics; Turbulence kinetic energy; Particle image velocimetry; Drag; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow (mathematics); Drag coefficient; Materials science; Thermodynamics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002881287,0.0001362462,0.0002799635,0.00009356912,0.00002800331,0.00006778797,0.0004727643,0.0000739259,0.000006286746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002841478,0.0001203241,0.00003649391,0.0001237676,0.00003632929,0.0002021262,0.00003779679,0.0003511755,0.000003369635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002120218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000575724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002799661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006942251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989471,0.000008956476,0.0004509589,0.0001122096,0.0001143195,0.0003664642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.0001841548,0.00003790829,0.0002745004,0.00002828209,0.000389874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003090247,0.0000292947,0.002819354,0.00009336074,0.0002440086,0.00004911727,0.001807445,0.6825083,0.2996297,0.0001298935,0.007678534,0.004979999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004382514,0.00001976329,0.000504078,0.00004923958,0.00001433572,0.0000271428,0.00002247491,0.9699746,0.02837831,0.00004123002,0.0003897618,0.0001408531],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973546,0.0006360913,0.001216065,0.0003129242,0.0002381406,0.0001388141,0.00005035597,0.00001904202,0.00003394988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950999,0.00000166222,0.004610315,0.00001441232,0.0002184759,0.000006761618,0.00001495881,0.00003183525,0.000001695827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2874662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4906673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03173836921929568,"score_gpt":0.2680255849925657,"score_spread":0.2362872157732701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}