{"id":"W2106652091","doi":"10.1109/59.871729","title":"Optimal power flow by a nonlinear complementarity method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear system; Power flow; Nonlinear complementarity problem; Mathematics; Newton's method; Complementarity (molecular biology); Complementarity theory; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Control theory (sociology); Electric power system; Power (physics); Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008005793,0.0007045681,0.0007397601,0.0007246044,0.0005198455,0.0007335043,0.0007284536,0.0008803004,0.006268117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001502116,0.0004209888,0.0006927163,0.0006513598,0.0008918496,0.000788551,0.0009484713,0.00123431,0.001143387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008283206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001476321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005644287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003636362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995696,0.0001755012,0.00001322974,0.00005495255,0.0001579203,0.00002883293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999642,0.0001830121,0.00002760785,0.00002577247,0.0001040718,0.00001752582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004427067,0.00003339724,0.000145707,0.0001340369,0.00002140598,0.0000535287,0.00007975699,0.8135358,0.002909965,0.09040782,0.003747214,0.08888706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008929147,0.00001182385,0.00002539026,0.00001037617,0.000003321644,0.00001129836,0.000005327527,0.9854608,0.0004141573,0.009608334,0.004435047,0.000005115928],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006242281,0.00007015641,0.9961069,0.00005674032,0.00002866982,0.00002396893,0.00001635721,0.00007662352,0.002996229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1239609,0.0005486942,0.8604356,0.0001414673,0.000112694,0.0004953771,0.0001040777,0.0001898352,0.01401136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006268117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02096891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009346318082738099,"score_gpt":0.2431992182322972,"score_spread":0.2338529001495591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}