{"id":"W2106673865","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.001","title":"The additive utility assumption of the QALY model revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Independence (probability theory); Population; Medicine; Quality-adjusted life year; Econometrics; Demography; Actuarial science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Cost effectiveness; Environmental health; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02170277,0.0005975181,0.00223239,0.0009031404,0.0009074282,0.00450118,0.004189451,0.01515769,0.008574259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07463405,0.0009190636,0.001842452,0.001344086,0.004849203,0.007436847,0.001491922,0.03383744,0.001823616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005577878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002583237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009172752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006888571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879037,0.007117153,0.0007042421,0.001362576,0.002269501,0.0006428947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9295123,0.06346139,0.001508864,0.002254002,0.002831807,0.0004316182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226009,0.00002943682,0.001032981,0.00008438315,0.00009220283,0.0006619297,0.0001912972,0.002694855,0.00009239719,0.9169565,0.0617142,0.01632724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007462936,0.00001578317,0.00071593,0.0001159558,0.000037152,0.0008155096,0.00008885364,0.01273738,0.00009734218,0.9595688,0.0256985,0.00003428653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005136746,0.004454741,0.06857537,0.892849,0.003206401,0.00002936532,0.0007212567,0.00007999233,0.02494709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4736079,0.008086726,0.04539454,0.4027156,0.04683447,0.0002839474,0.0004126421,0.0002918605,0.0223723],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02170277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1147766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3777163417402323,"score_gpt":0.430103063255421,"score_spread":0.05238672151518869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}