{"id":"W2106685765","doi":"10.4153/cmb-2009-005-4","title":"A Representation Theorem for Archimedean Quadratic Modules on ∗-Rings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Mathematical Bulletin","topic":"Advanced Operator Algebra Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Noncommutative geometry; Mathematics; Commutative property; Involution (esoterism); Pure mathematics; Noncommutative algebraic geometry; Representation theorem; Noncommutative ring; Algebra over a field; Representation theory; Commutative ring; Associative property; Noncommutative quantum field theory; Ring (chemistry)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109834,0.0002820701,0.0004935991,0.001092499,0.0008218387,0.001856805,0.0008013902,0.000566916,0.004940055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00150962,0.00016406,0.0006080127,0.0007968514,0.001839689,0.003081009,0.001566631,0.001199357,0.0006002957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007659255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004851711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004261227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000185462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999316,0.0001233016,0.00002982972,0.0001227614,0.0003094374,0.00009873493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993817,0.0001853421,0.0000821058,0.00008249447,0.0001704105,0.00009797694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006770968,0.00001350573,0.00007460047,0.00001762608,0.000003722543,0.00005411583,0.0001074778,0.000379262,0.0008497668,0.9945086,0.0006629095,0.003321743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001493488,0.00002638655,0.0002098671,0.00001091208,0.000004867248,0.0002744598,0.00005617059,0.005159309,0.0008677752,0.9881346,0.005229312,0.00001134019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4726379,0.003172701,0.3595025,0.004469284,0.0009730011,0.00008622742,0.0003905658,0.0004991845,0.1582687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637881,0.0006662537,0.01864289,0.0004619326,0.0005121845,0.00004476904,0.0001360936,0.00005578727,0.01569202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004940055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01652616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07356337477871666,"score_gpt":0.3658097914269993,"score_spread":0.2922464166482826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}