{"id":"W2106737280","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v1n1p2","title":"Sample-based Estimation of Regional Forest Tree Species Richness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Pooling; Estimator; Sample (material); Statistics; Estimation; Species diversity; Geography; Sampling design; Ecology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Biology; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004932267,0.00009465783,0.0001175748,0.00008893305,0.0002770677,0.000008542633,0.0001686511,0.00006332923,0.0009223683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114968,0.00007603772,0.00003469515,0.000140618,0.001202538,0.00009765409,0.0002043821,0.000211003,0.00006327008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007014036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003739293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001051947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000161227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987742,0.0001162617,0.000160732,0.0002339914,0.0004677636,0.0002470204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992742,0.0004599829,0.00005844375,0.0001437948,0.000006837756,0.00005676553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001773732,0.0001233266,0.9862081,0.0000194426,0.00001938001,0.000003555316,0.001998062,0.002082716,0.0007500303,0.001507267,0.0003359065,0.00677479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002733408,0.0001425553,0.9736292,0.000007874157,0.000006128547,9.430756e-7,0.0002365252,0.0198611,0.0004099937,0.002510494,0.002834531,0.00008736033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938446,0.0003158246,0.0006343798,0.0002636104,0.00002096275,0.0001677856,0.000003909477,0.000009531581,0.004739389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951648,0.0001566735,0.003030573,0.00002911598,0.00001316698,0.00002144561,0.00001239766,0.000006591364,0.0015652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01777838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05107757893988719,"score_gpt":0.2821842451717611,"score_spread":0.2311066662318739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}