{"id":"W2106824165","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2010.9669258","title":"Racial Inequalities in the Symbolic Realm: The Brazilian Context","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Realm; Newspaper; Inequality; Girl; Representation (politics); Racism; Sociology; Norm (philosophy); The Symbolic; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); White (mutation); Media studies; Political science; Psychology; History; Art; Visual arts; Law; Psychoanalysis; Developmental psychology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001590665,0.0002098443,0.0003878185,0.001752972,0.007039786,0.003655507,0.0004340008,0.0006883912,0.004553026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004198656,0.0001909329,0.0001370175,0.003098529,0.007431231,0.00150504,0.002836141,0.001103307,0.0001085443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005869018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007087701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2003883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2954437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987133,0.0005702406,0.00003871034,0.0001138909,0.0002042273,0.0003597269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980115,0.0008879065,0.0004082557,0.00008450631,0.0002403365,0.0003674451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004034267,0.00007407553,0.03397842,0.000444167,0.00001669258,0.001189349,0.5184121,0.0001237442,0.001318661,0.3961214,0.003034786,0.04524627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001381001,0.00007160692,0.1707482,0.002414292,0.00005691578,0.0009961657,0.5486201,0.0004330222,0.0005637893,0.04946705,0.2265696,0.00004546646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8065576,0.0119035,0.0004597629,0.04105595,0.0001204137,0.00003325581,0.0001932091,0.00001094174,0.1396654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966229,0.001967294,0.00009526806,0.0003674584,0.00002349565,0.000006040797,0.00001136824,0.000003059727,0.0009030622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2003883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07424498097219814,"score_gpt":0.3051906303045706,"score_spread":0.2309456493323724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}