{"id":"W2106874974","doi":"10.1002/jps.20560","title":"Thermodynamic modeling of activity coefficient and prediction of solubility: Part 1 predictive models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","topic":"Crystallization and Solubility Studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Activity coefficient; UNIFAC; Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Gibbs free energy; Solubility; Hildebrand solubility parameter; Solvent; Vapor–liquid equilibrium; Stearic acid; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Chromatography; Aqueous solution; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001869504,0.00008980509,0.0002799026,0.00008660547,0.0001402623,0.00002638929,0.0001691625,0.0000390798,0.00006040544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001113132,0.00006372655,0.00007134703,0.0002220902,0.0008683445,0.0004079106,0.00007949322,0.00009541957,1.930305e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004210708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009546558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004581699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001010151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983159,0.0001351644,0.0005524352,0.0001754856,0.0006443572,0.000176611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990477,0.0001631265,0.0003343092,0.00007064558,0.0003117688,0.00007243978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002598394,0.00058823,0.00367739,0.0001038408,0.00002105577,0.000001187301,0.0006946187,0.5651882,0.4257215,0.002676012,0.00003231398,0.001035751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003309788,0.0002402414,0.001453295,0.00005114699,0.00004401878,0.000006812671,0.0003191608,0.9685513,0.02325896,0.005667293,0.00002695462,0.00004982205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978521,0.0003882638,0.1005959,0.000145973,0.0002194886,0.0001065336,0.00003673762,0.000008566431,0.0006464419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993435,0.0001285062,0.0004510558,0.00001208875,0.00005257241,0.000001223939,2.429205e-7,0.000002862972,0.000007963206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4033631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3199451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0787878740637589,"score_gpt":0.3330961143884676,"score_spread":0.2543082403247088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}