{"id":"W2106887277","doi":"10.1109/glsv.1995.516048","title":"A protocol extraction strategy for control point insertion in design for test of transition signaling circuits","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic circuit; Overhead (engineering); Computer science; Identification (biology); Point (geometry); Protocol (science); Reduction (mathematics); Signaling protocol; Hazard; Matching (statistics); Embedded system; Computer hardware; Engineering; Mathematics; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037408,0.0008714296,0.0005395583,0.001044967,0.000529873,0.000910971,0.0009490471,0.0007908982,0.00283952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002130757,0.0004327418,0.0006225778,0.0005715588,0.001122968,0.001393602,0.0008906107,0.001421059,0.0009416048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005755167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001030138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000391565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003931213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986859,0.0003483556,0.0001078846,0.0001857134,0.0005312228,0.0001409064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988176,0.0005058267,0.0001492311,0.0002714177,0.0002222884,0.00003359572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005079967,0.0002937982,0.0008402771,0.0005762816,0.00007539573,0.0009016594,0.000420021,0.03149944,0.2858237,0.2631783,0.004188105,0.4116951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002605813,0.001744398,0.0005686553,0.0001856824,0.0002115072,0.001684019,0.0001395927,0.3213162,0.5191394,0.1254644,0.02916356,0.0001219765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008324185,0.00007538663,0.9885847,0.0001072835,0.00003014345,0.0001904224,0.00003104975,0.001069393,0.001587503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2878449,0.0002627637,0.7072204,0.0002576004,0.00005831366,0.0006592716,0.0002421653,0.0002404073,0.003214256],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00283952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009499073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09794109009595961,"score_gpt":0.3013136386800657,"score_spread":0.2033725485841061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}