{"id":"W2106887277","doi":"10.1109/glsv.1995.516048","title":"A protocol extraction strategy for control point insertion in design for test of transition signaling circuits","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic circuit; Overhead (engineering); Computer science; Identification (biology); Point (geometry); Protocol (science); Reduction (mathematics); Signaling protocol; Hazard; Matching (statistics); Embedded system; Computer hardware; Engineering; Mathematics; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005622727,0.00009961029,0.0001578135,0.000128032,0.000070233,0.00005604209,0.000150263,0.00006226979,0.00001145255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000156901,0.00009455749,0.00006900878,0.0002183703,0.00001093803,0.0005909302,0.000003032674,0.00005721251,0.000001489693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004086943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003281748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000203024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001009542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990014,0.00004735499,0.0003778919,0.0002477413,0.0001123435,0.0002132245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989305,0.0006289559,0.0001409882,0.0001176312,0.00014558,0.00003641987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000625758,0.0005765897,0.0002031877,0.000272877,0.00001050506,0.000002873985,0.00064705,0.04741682,0.5193187,0.002605306,0.00007923851,0.4288606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002346686,0.0007135441,0.0003517646,0.00008336303,0.000006063222,0.000008448573,0.00004118607,0.9537209,0.03887694,0.003713851,0.00001420668,0.0001230675],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009924576,0.000003973985,0.9626281,0.0001690954,0.00001966986,0.03593144,0.000003087806,0.0000756075,0.0001765875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575381,1.793363e-7,0.006953808,0.0000881261,0.00003985698,0.03535448,0.000001353559,0.000007644392,0.00001640505],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09794109009595961,"score_gpt":0.3013136386800657,"score_spread":0.2033725485841061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}