{"id":"W2106890697","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x","title":"Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":833,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Niche; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Neutrality; Biological dispersal; Ecological niche; Ecology; Coexistence theory; Competitive exclusion; Relative abundance distribution; Relative species abundance; Biology; Statistical physics; Abundance (ecology); Physics; Competition (biology); Population; Sociology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006134887,0.0003926351,0.000689975,0.000672748,0.0009265715,0.002165838,0.002201381,0.003665472,0.006398984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01814631,0.0002196298,0.0005781915,0.0004324062,0.006381115,0.006566959,0.003086179,0.003810409,0.001776712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00112377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004959163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001985776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000144866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971699,0.001181724,0.00008767372,0.0004690246,0.0008515725,0.0002399912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917018,0.005167512,0.0008784418,0.0009914397,0.0005825281,0.0006783529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004105014,0.0001209731,0.00782712,0.0001646807,0.0001084389,0.001853211,0.0007057173,0.003313079,0.003843426,0.8985716,0.008164984,0.0749163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007697335,0.0001672381,0.001776027,0.00004421198,0.00001796993,0.002282683,0.0002525024,0.01441403,0.0006253999,0.9694703,0.01083109,0.00004157302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2977281,0.007047947,0.3354872,0.2343741,0.003922888,0.00008357249,0.0002490664,0.001027605,0.1200796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655069,0.0008821975,0.008134601,0.02042585,0.001827842,0.00008249789,0.00006188879,0.0000675486,0.003010605],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006398984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03244478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04698286439631342,"score_gpt":0.1807492333325005,"score_spread":0.133766368936187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}