{"id":"W2106975697","doi":"10.1139/l2012-026","title":"Evaluation of contact and noncontact lap splices in concrete block masonry construction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"Canada Masonry Design Centre; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Grout; Masonry; Structural engineering; Materials science; Lap joint; splice; Composite material; Block (permutation group theory); Failure mode and effects analysis; Bar (unit); Geology; Engineering; Mathematics; Geometry; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007769827,0.0001255946,0.0002773582,0.0003550562,0.0000196646,0.00001947774,0.00007727517,0.00007253896,0.0001822966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001007499,0.0001259896,0.00006357276,0.0001922443,0.00002023925,0.0003569646,0.000003868218,0.0001942399,6.429912e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001709384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001214929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005241021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01123509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990924,0.00003352416,0.0003570547,0.0000559969,0.0002109106,0.000250085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993349,0.00004926381,0.00009339677,0.00007549168,0.000139244,0.0003077126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003022864,0.000002704426,0.1585815,0.0005586307,0.001193644,0.00005715836,0.004295508,0.7364935,0.06855662,0.003168976,0.0002376156,0.02682388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002964514,0.0001703691,0.2568052,0.0008810273,0.001138925,0.001131223,0.001376962,0.7204319,0.008708547,0.0001410887,0.00528816,0.0009621283],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932483,0.004572295,0.0001376813,0.00001754068,0.0004517181,0.00006229732,0.00000743299,0.000008597097,0.00149415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.0000657304,0.0002039126,0.000005100042,0.0001580245,0.000001573445,0.000001292224,0.0000136219,0.000002112169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09822362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6269444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009950391191202711,"score_gpt":0.1990075000337052,"score_spread":0.1890571088425024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}