{"id":"W2106996230","doi":"10.1139/f06-078","title":"Contrasting deterministic and probabilistic ranking of catch quotas and spatially and size-regulated fisheries management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southeast Fisheries Science Center; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Fisheries management; Stock assessment; Fishery; Population; Variety (cybernetics); Statistical model; Ranking (information retrieval); Ecology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Fishing; Biology; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0205376,0.0006147487,0.0009018256,0.001518677,0.0004752908,0.002017813,0.001244163,0.0011006,0.001224279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06097644,0.0004655972,0.001347128,0.001279425,0.001060269,0.002327834,0.001199186,0.0009796241,0.0001516939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003249532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01112477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01796878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870303,0.009484123,0.0005012758,0.0007622015,0.001505494,0.00071656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.930345,0.05690302,0.006452071,0.002764975,0.002915493,0.000619514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001359556,0.0002856108,0.08828235,0.0001967402,0.0008306075,0.00008454285,0.0002784065,0.8362328,0.001312743,0.03217774,0.0008348685,0.0381239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001471251,0.0009789829,0.06383227,0.0000463742,0.000277746,0.00007658459,0.0005084818,0.9077352,0.001508829,0.02362118,0.001123957,0.0001433263],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376503,0.0003115094,0.05403704,0.000834252,0.00004717805,0.0001431441,0.0003958049,0.0001336141,0.00644712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927928,0.00007050132,0.006574007,0.00006242105,0.00000771049,0.00005817899,0.0001321396,0.00001228969,0.0002898794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0205376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1086145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01256913173733632,"score_gpt":0.2097317173175995,"score_spread":0.1971625855802632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}