{"id":"W2107043727","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.058","title":"Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: Image quality and system performance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cone beam ct; Radiation therapy; Radiology; Radiation treatment planning; External beam radiotherapy; Medical physics; Image quality; Cone beam computed tomography; Image (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computed tomography; Brachytherapy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129905,0.0006042016,0.0006097691,0.0007595457,0.0003028544,0.00097633,0.0008666063,0.0006999802,0.004217755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005296687,0.0008370114,0.0004379141,0.0008000077,0.0001923918,0.0009637869,0.0006180925,0.0007387013,0.000679737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007320424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001009203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004852934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005556602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993154,0.0001440204,0.00005462391,0.0000948667,0.0003544608,0.0000366065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975272,0.001299631,0.0003715953,0.0002576286,0.0004297238,0.0001141848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007981122,0.0009817093,0.02423185,0.0007242606,0.0002371036,0.0005239374,0.0005832358,0.05113709,0.2509365,0.0008232982,0.005312993,0.6565269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007966525,0.003400022,0.128185,0.0001555507,0.0008958265,0.006791757,0.0001864673,0.4792875,0.3707711,0.001111267,0.007967768,0.0004510586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4266893,0.003481043,0.5539681,0.0006416891,0.0002465827,0.0006859305,0.001250075,0.007338618,0.005698564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7469111,0.0009066417,0.2465205,0.0002695119,0.00007071153,0.0002075574,0.0004221241,0.002075417,0.002616429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004852934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01410973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03550786426564993,"score_gpt":0.3912079778936423,"score_spread":0.3557001136279923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}