{"id":"W2107145249","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2010.5683105","title":"Performance of Energy Detection: A Complementary AUC Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Receiver operating characteristic; Fading; Nakagami distribution; Area under curve; Rayleigh fading; Computer science; Maximal-ratio combining; Energy (signal processing); Detection theory; Detector; Upper and lower bounds; Proxy (statistics); Algorithm; Statistics; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Channel (broadcasting); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000104987,0.00006954536,0.0000946256,0.00005553355,0.00008586895,0.00002750751,0.0002355836,0.00002454868,0.00003998361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002044719,0.00006022613,0.00003768503,0.0002305907,0.00003851104,0.0001784621,0.00009826828,0.00009781632,0.000002138726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007156129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001573162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000863704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001868626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993924,0.00001458867,0.0001309095,0.0001811914,0.0001283667,0.0001525628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995964,0.00002792142,0.00004179335,0.0002457409,0.00004580133,0.00004231752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001526881,0.0001290561,0.003202966,0.00001637623,0.00003515974,0.000003658585,0.0001897459,0.0001440418,0.0359487,0.1058876,0.0003371291,0.8540903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001899496,0.00009122396,0.005207666,0.000003428752,0.000003069639,0.00006470177,0.00001258107,0.9540192,0.0367272,0.0002799248,0.003290152,0.000110928],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3529275,0.000009522818,0.6083707,0.00009559344,0.0002626869,0.00003285515,2.970737e-7,0.0000625475,0.03823829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567266,0.000006345351,0.04291397,0.0001395161,0.0001132126,0.000001678807,0.000001208286,0.00000343092,0.00009402066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.245595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01113596017800006,"score_gpt":0.2077467967688589,"score_spread":0.1966108365908588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}