{"id":"W2107205138","doi":"10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03888.x","title":"Ground beetle responses to patch retention harvesting in high elevation forests of British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Entomological Society of Canada","keywords":"Clearcutting; Abundance (ecology); Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Habitat; Disturbance (geology); Canopy; Ground beetle; Geography; Logging; Old-growth forest; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000180485,0.0000436601,0.0001064494,0.00002373625,0.0001461697,0.00003800878,0.00008816375,0.00006406181,0.00004664804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006316329,0.00003266623,0.00005692581,0.0005713033,0.00006389387,0.0001104348,0.00004578321,0.00004992662,0.000009255615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001457759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003263567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1203345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.797219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994287,0.0000286264,0.0001420682,0.0001669619,0.00008333844,0.0001502423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997755,0.00006083142,0.00005825703,0.0000233951,0.00005255971,0.0000294039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002391765,0.00005359362,0.9930788,0.000004503043,0.000007116265,0.000006383377,0.00003926865,0.00000388761,0.001221361,0.00002206879,0.0005739335,0.004965117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001740927,0.000336749,0.9958039,0.00003737312,0.00000509468,0.000001953524,0.0001509399,4.091761e-7,0.00005535872,0.002972898,0.0003866887,0.00007455431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991436,0.00003261139,0.000001015319,0.0004051288,0.00008597384,0.0001524361,0.00007760699,0.00002300553,0.00007859983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993582,0.00001819413,0.0002100731,0.0000850346,0.00002890049,0.000008370824,0.00003276624,3.175614e-7,0.0002580849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6768845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8855233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01737017429871496,"score_gpt":0.1956870406441528,"score_spread":0.1783168663454379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}