{"id":"W2107301875","doi":"10.1139/a09-002","title":"Scientific advice on species at risk: a comparative analysis of status assessments of polar bear,<i>Ursus maritimus</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Dalhousie University","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Australian Government; World Bank Group","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Population; Ursus; Environmental resource management; Government (linguistics); Ecology; Geography; Political science; Environmental planning; Biology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681689,0.0001632606,0.0003331241,0.004095403,0.000738234,0.001299467,0.0003917646,0.0004611704,0.001726134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03999271,0.0001170143,0.0002873701,0.004238247,0.0008695169,0.001010733,0.001127857,0.0003869481,0.0002285494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00208112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003644302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02393023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08610936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886763,0.006333966,0.0007352572,0.0005086318,0.003434451,0.0003114191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607147,0.02074386,0.006936149,0.0006196226,0.01052104,0.0004646208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008397968,0.0000565076,0.5138947,0.003169765,0.0006323019,0.0009539506,0.0425494,0.001536999,0.001537856,0.00680815,0.01169303,0.4163275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001957564,0.000387593,0.8919173,0.001532592,0.0004167333,0.0005238469,0.04723225,0.0006615696,0.0008443342,0.001599716,0.05482606,0.00003839667],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9113302,0.04075637,0.001383115,0.00887218,0.0001255313,0.0001443511,0.00104018,0.00001942998,0.03632865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845856,0.01093647,0.001350309,0.0004173649,0.000053997,0.00004502944,0.0003591846,0.000008867633,0.002243229],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02393023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08893734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0360014114916666,"score_gpt":0.3044099494342302,"score_spread":0.2684085379425636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}