{"id":"W2107304908","doi":"10.1177/0093854813496999","title":"The Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale–Youth Version in a Diverse Sample of Violent Young Offenders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Predictive validity; Scale (ratio); Intraclass correlation; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Reliability (semiconductor); Occupational safety and health; Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Medicine; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004439821,0.0003808326,0.0004255113,0.001441077,0.0005423382,0.0006256334,0.0004592182,0.0004013613,0.00055192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284232,0.0004097268,0.0006111361,0.000784998,0.0005866493,0.0005846226,0.001113901,0.0007528042,0.0002207233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004138766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005067716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003879691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978916,0.0007731442,0.000345434,0.0002196975,0.0006366012,0.0001336244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958911,0.001562666,0.00095398,0.0002897026,0.0009885739,0.000313858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008041323,0.0001065103,0.9930402,0.00001339011,0.00005308187,0.00005898191,0.0007332347,0.00008246334,0.0002195609,0.00005419628,0.0001562706,0.005401676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152134,0.0001734241,0.9979826,0.00001827981,0.00001718963,0.0002219436,0.0006747981,0.0005132426,0.0001313502,0.00006617564,0.0001809083,0.000004873814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.00005708145,0.0002070422,0.00001953854,0.00000656829,0.00003779905,0.0001030433,0.000003423995,0.0003518475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986718,0.00008626107,0.0005866681,0.00001900063,0.000005626752,0.00007663311,0.0004144865,0.000005406233,0.000134231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004439821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0234803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04292036797212768,"score_gpt":0.3063095399777114,"score_spread":0.2633891720055838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}