{"id":"W2107650959","doi":"10.1007/s10479-006-0026-7","title":"DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":462,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Supply chain; Data envelopment analysis; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Supply chain management; Measure (data warehouse); Theory of computation; Service management; Chain (unit); Operations research; Microeconomics; Business; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Marketing; Mathematics; Data mining; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008166837,0.002046806,0.002687257,0.00233213,0.0007015768,0.002256586,0.00200448,0.001652219,0.004653645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01983852,0.001194487,0.001899467,0.00353574,0.0009319822,0.003489348,0.001404214,0.003013344,0.0007260438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002678399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001512709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005587216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004854712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954693,0.003196182,0.0001864213,0.0002835974,0.0006739678,0.0001905512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823952,0.01505159,0.0005621179,0.0007151385,0.001138269,0.0001375595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036936,0.00004304686,0.0001545504,0.00005996516,0.00007036888,0.00001568762,0.00002629483,0.9129934,0.0001637763,0.06885391,0.0005161485,0.01706587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004376659,0.000008617468,0.00003864605,0.0000088116,0.00001151227,0.000004769723,0.000004861756,0.9733247,0.00008023578,0.02598493,0.0005240844,0.000004437754],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005310448,0.0006678219,0.991243,0.0001532189,0.00003379711,0.0000438253,0.0001154109,0.00007034315,0.002362087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5373784,0.003713036,0.4445531,0.000208054,0.0001810247,0.0009981946,0.0008247536,0.000225241,0.01191819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008166837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04319084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5687705235917271,"score_gpt":0.5828705551331151,"score_spread":0.01410003154138806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}