{"id":"W2107739837","doi":"10.1139/f07-100","title":"Predicting the invasion success of an introduced omnivore in a large, heterogeneous reservoir","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Forage fish; Biology; Predation; Fishery; Omnivore; Zooplankton; Clupeidae; Ecology; Trophic level; Planktivore; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Phytoplankton","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005023001,0.0002637699,0.0001979349,0.0004912838,0.0004508804,0.0005625828,0.0003062635,0.0002810238,0.0004944036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001099422,0.0001966,0.0001998128,0.0001924134,0.0002634269,0.0004841658,0.0006642349,0.0002199567,0.00007255794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004678165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002958806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01716094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06745212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998784,0.00003264713,0.000007011883,0.00004125957,0.00001384689,0.0000267733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992471,0.0002022326,0.0002533391,0.00004324361,0.00005138568,0.000202725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264376,0.0001427746,0.9767957,0.00001068974,0.00007807845,0.0002332246,0.0002031949,0.01039102,0.007089818,0.00009834347,0.00005458818,0.004776144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001327263,0.0004681447,0.9138497,0.000006795554,0.00008206331,0.0001681245,0.0005042184,0.08329986,0.001304191,0.00013705,0.0001445747,0.00002210413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997818,0.0000035443,0.0001425742,0.000002577623,2.019118e-7,0.000002007247,0.000005124964,0.000001422035,0.00006074794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995232,0.000007528052,0.0003851107,0.000001856925,5.781122e-7,0.000002186812,0.00002000621,5.699506e-7,0.0000589556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.982839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03412211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01562427649432642,"score_gpt":0.228388065200352,"score_spread":0.2127637887060256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}