{"id":"W2107865511","doi":"10.1080/02687040042000089","title":"Relevance is in the eye and ear of the beholder: An example from populations with a neurological impairment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aphasiology","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Relevance (law); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Dementia; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Disease; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001010678,0.00006620294,0.0001034691,0.00001915366,0.0001587881,0.00002858498,0.0002705359,0.00002870455,0.0003191543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009057828,0.0000306649,0.00001829606,0.00003348594,0.0004767916,0.00008402026,0.00005118079,0.0001181758,0.000001802336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000267056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001174331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004958361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01607923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993497,0.0002226657,0.0001339241,0.0001269112,0.00006395866,0.0001029114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993085,0.0001461727,0.00006928192,0.0004425965,0.0000210882,0.00001234497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002058699,0.000575966,0.2407453,0.000005589409,0.00003586545,0.00001795461,0.2215259,0.00005582859,0.0003082304,0.5333613,0.0008841575,0.00227807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007521116,0.0005827026,0.9071814,0.00001170538,0.0000281858,0.0000155369,0.02983871,0.000121906,0.00001420129,0.0327751,0.02856082,0.0001176067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941195,0.0002645894,0.000006004289,0.002673379,0.00003377837,0.0001520908,0.00001369628,0.00001217853,0.002724823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998317,0.00005946129,0.00008430904,0.001337216,0.00004261473,0.00002310781,0.00001301117,0.000004353251,0.0001189361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1272904011086784,"score_gpt":0.3062086617827081,"score_spread":0.1789182606740297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}