{"id":"W2108096932","doi":"10.1145/1740582.1740584","title":"On the completeness of compositional reasoning methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Completeness (order theory); Computer science; Concurrency; Reasoning system; Automated reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Component (thermodynamics); Model checking; Theoretical computer science; Qualitative reasoning; Programming language; Model-based reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Knowledge representation and reasoning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03668404,0.001702205,0.002175808,0.003347462,0.004019518,0.004854936,0.003398327,0.003056334,0.005026496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09883411,0.001845626,0.004858962,0.00168021,0.0113786,0.01829664,0.008261238,0.00833887,0.001902123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002174231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005206001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003083667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002598175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.966875,0.01294672,0.002789128,0.003539787,0.0123997,0.001449751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.854274,0.1096046,0.003179493,0.01979587,0.01209994,0.00104615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000144247,0.0001317393,0.0007115211,0.0004863743,0.0001168931,0.0002056008,0.001659774,0.02445897,0.002339076,0.9166059,0.001906139,0.05123364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007173422,0.00005180573,0.00009832209,0.0001226571,0.00005442641,0.00009264516,0.0001126484,0.0681841,0.003931483,0.9213177,0.005925782,0.00003657984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009319447,0.0005994298,0.9805191,0.001206418,0.0000807558,0.0002158503,0.000126548,0.0005554467,0.007377062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1632432,0.001288933,0.8280579,0.0007611418,0.0004288749,0.0007265556,0.0006649739,0.0005870334,0.004241427],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03668404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.194006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05707745779628404,"score_gpt":0.361903936170222,"score_spread":0.3048264783739379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}