{"id":"W2108102148","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2005)10:4(260)","title":"Assessing and Managing the Potential Environmental Risks of Construction Projects","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Risk analysis (engineering); Liability; Plan (archaeology); Business; Risk management; Identification (biology); Environmental planning; Construction management; Action plan; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Civil engineering; Finance; Actuarial science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007732735,0.000642058,0.0004368001,0.002443619,0.001173311,0.003812159,0.0008235521,0.001378989,0.001286482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150274,0.0003938528,0.0002957021,0.001468836,0.0008516954,0.002586458,0.001654579,0.0007586606,0.0002610407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001885125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005589262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008716043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929872,0.003782581,0.000321598,0.0002059105,0.002228172,0.0004745863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934018,0.003674365,0.001280326,0.0002268143,0.001066598,0.0003500958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000251272,0.0004506375,0.08770083,0.0003907957,0.0002166085,0.0007645492,0.002254674,0.5470409,0.004911683,0.0348373,0.003871367,0.3173093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001131972,0.001399558,0.07813706,0.000520828,0.0002528403,0.0009937983,0.01612544,0.7350919,0.01158611,0.1158599,0.0396526,0.000266883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277842,0.002239504,0.1179175,0.003964773,0.00004470707,0.0005592991,0.0001920896,0.0001719142,0.04712603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617513,0.001690299,0.03450181,0.00003788397,0.00002344125,0.00009554961,0.00009938165,0.000009312277,0.001791032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007732735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0408951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1199910683185432,"score_gpt":0.3914907587531034,"score_spread":0.2714996904345601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}