{"id":"W2108112270","doi":"10.1109/wcnc.2005.1424775","title":"Latency analysis of WAP 2.0 for short-lived flows","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Network Traffic and Congestion Control","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latency (audio); Computer science; Network packet; File transfer; Wireless Application Protocol; Wireless; Markov chain; Computer network; Markov process; Channel (broadcasting); Transfer (computing); Real-time computing; Wireless network; Parallel computing; Mathematics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001621085,0.0006655542,0.0004475522,0.001108778,0.0005195071,0.0009085139,0.0008197024,0.0004670499,0.0007880639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007670272,0.0003235074,0.0003239911,0.0006309706,0.0007519843,0.001907699,0.0007264467,0.0007640098,0.0001628791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001541379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001300901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003878464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001697507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992336,0.0001191982,0.00003011365,0.00007683925,0.0002884773,0.0002517137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956794,0.002354417,0.0006118559,0.0002955735,0.0009149811,0.0001436814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003369702,0.0000814679,0.007429257,0.000185428,0.00005466159,0.000704642,0.0003958306,0.8232281,0.05155667,0.0860145,0.001237996,0.02877445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003503855,0.00005013135,0.0006983329,0.00001015335,0.000008355313,0.0001032563,0.00004603985,0.9884842,0.003629724,0.006608402,0.0003439071,0.00001406109],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5255615,0.002366719,0.4650386,0.0004117078,0.00007249006,0.00008896317,0.0001337081,0.0008400098,0.005486249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926915,0.0004627483,0.005857231,0.0000266295,0.00002401351,0.00003809679,0.00003991215,0.00004225062,0.0008177342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003878464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0111835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02105936145026543,"score_gpt":0.2588284181450549,"score_spread":0.2377690566947894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}