{"id":"W2108123151","doi":"10.1139/t10-010","title":"A review of 41 legal cases involving geotechnical practice in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Bidding; Geotechnical investigation; Foundation (evidence); Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Business; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004820181,0.0008410324,0.001456064,0.02181735,0.002835177,0.002307048,0.002247154,0.001184109,0.004349096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681546,0.0006455111,0.0007580175,0.03595364,0.002033916,0.001107678,0.001027248,0.0005860059,0.0006597284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03066328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09748379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8083856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9014004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927073,0.0005774547,0.0009740223,0.0004028948,0.004929778,0.0004084498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835562,0.004456098,0.002707884,0.0002697832,0.008531081,0.0004789824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001299666,0.00008527624,0.014965,0.06666587,0.0002705232,0.002894505,0.0039132,0.0004154683,0.001027517,0.002779134,0.07349946,0.8333541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003504793,0.000108838,0.07668606,0.04672536,0.0008774568,0.003523262,0.003892791,0.000150056,0.00114665,0.0003857389,0.8663716,0.00009693983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007351203,0.9781156,0.0002598,0.001068996,0.000169985,0.0002748173,0.001085445,0.00001955052,0.01165452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02122661,0.9754993,0.0005263891,0.000447582,0.00004132406,0.00006985287,0.0007174269,0.000006783489,0.001464766],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1916144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3854858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01529392625702219,"score_gpt":0.253116864384282,"score_spread":0.2378229381272599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}