{"id":"W2108142964","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2030409","title":"Enhancements to the Cumulant Method for Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Cumulant; Monte Carlo method; Power flow; Limit (mathematics); Probability density function; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Random variable; Power (physics); Flow (mathematics); Algorithm; Mathematics; Electric power system; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004507645,0.0003111816,0.0003555221,0.0001139776,0.0002223193,0.00008845602,0.0002424887,0.00009933113,0.00002398518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000212712,0.0002407608,0.0001638984,0.0002928264,0.00002139275,0.0001739,0.000001166233,0.0001965235,0.0001558623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003252437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002013792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006225593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008545138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983815,0.00006717636,0.0004458948,0.0003446742,0.0003002094,0.0004605286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990367,0.0001610502,0.00004093015,0.0004668231,0.0001766216,0.0001178215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007157506,0.0001000986,1.450812e-7,0.0000597211,0.0002024934,0.000002075168,0.0009806305,0.9887096,0.002222589,0.0001394383,0.006488238,0.001023365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001452561,0.002443165,0.00004170658,0.0004297471,0.0002881735,0.0000499645,0.001591145,0.9129617,0.02156786,0.00007717295,0.05801126,0.00108557],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002981493,0.0003556718,0.9883598,0.0003527113,0.005076502,0.001822078,0.0003819945,0.0003531742,0.0003165514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988787,0.00001605522,0.0100005,0.0001206614,0.00003759757,0.0006031287,0.00000919429,0.00004131124,0.0003845348],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02378442984590687,"score_gpt":0.3024582184534522,"score_spread":0.2786737886075453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}