{"id":"W2108142964","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2030409","title":"Enhancements to the Cumulant Method for Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Cumulant; Monte Carlo method; Power flow; Limit (mathematics); Probability density function; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Random variable; Power (physics); Flow (mathematics); Algorithm; Mathematics; Electric power system; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676895,0.0009720048,0.0007211895,0.001476223,0.0005178973,0.0008749856,0.001277518,0.0008074467,0.003677298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01311533,0.0003677441,0.001040455,0.001397991,0.0006537047,0.001608072,0.001046776,0.001794889,0.001065589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005431017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001696937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003070152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003326243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982237,0.0007294935,0.00007183999,0.0001155515,0.0007997376,0.00005953109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952577,0.002883459,0.0002715741,0.0007026392,0.000803383,0.00008124984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795631,0.0001520437,0.0009611705,0.0002487549,0.00008175163,0.0002260705,0.0001273846,0.4704453,0.01300361,0.2112359,0.004763208,0.2986668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049365,0.0000279357,0.0001574551,0.00001710232,0.000009888073,0.00007244573,0.000006428477,0.9737287,0.0026553,0.01668555,0.006606389,0.00002231629],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008712416,0.00007133404,0.9974691,0.000039761,0.00002808316,0.00002257981,0.00001849536,0.0001510092,0.001328454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07197622,0.0004390394,0.9248996,0.0001087514,0.0001848093,0.0001887381,0.00009695977,0.0002934837,0.001812482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003677298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01415694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02378442984590687,"score_gpt":0.3024582184534522,"score_spread":0.2786737886075453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}