{"id":"W2108234087","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1401.4591","title":"Computing Approximate Nash Equilibria and Robust Best-Responses Using Sampling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Best response; Monte Carlo tree search; Perfect information; Monte Carlo method; Counterfactual thinking; Mathematical optimization; Game tree; Minimax; Regret; Sampling (signal processing); Game theory; Algorithm; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Sequential game","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002036546,0.0001101716,0.0002153255,0.001881065,0.0008414022,0.0003121483,0.0003896197,0.00008246288,0.0001195816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004513299,0.0001400648,0.00005104938,0.002118008,0.000181732,0.000544598,0.0003270721,0.0003317084,0.00006454319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001615362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008574044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002967422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001130412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986553,0.00006458281,0.0002735102,0.0004372766,0.00009826558,0.0004711296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986892,0.0003155489,0.000167611,0.0003971604,0.0002379202,0.0001926052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015431,0.0001157602,0.1485927,0.00004425368,0.00005552782,0.000002130126,0.000175103,0.005369885,0.000127205,0.8423731,0.0005392114,0.002584941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004137678,0.00005686859,0.01705181,0.00002558347,0.000009003403,0.000007367259,0.0003501983,0.7519382,0.00001201027,0.001716143,0.2281776,0.000241488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8152882,0.0003066319,0.1511954,0.0008168974,0.00006867258,0.000223194,0.00006146105,0.00007140009,0.03196813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825608,0.000216589,0.007816634,0.00002182607,0.0001059958,8.278419e-7,0.00002233368,0.00001944302,0.009235621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.840657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.647147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2834961292954156,"score_gpt":0.3278645535583071,"score_spread":0.0443684242628915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}