{"id":"W2108372800","doi":"10.5006/1.3500829","title":"Comparison of Impressed Current Cathodic Protection Numerical Modeling Results with Physical Scale Modeling Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CORROSION","topic":"Non-Destructive Testing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Technical University of Nova Scotia; Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Physical modelling; Current (fluid); Scale (ratio); Scale model; Engineering; Environmental science; Electrical engineering; Chemistry; Aerospace engineering; Electrochemistry; Physics; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001976005,0.0001812417,0.0002752683,0.00007474077,0.00007543467,0.0000234352,0.0003590742,0.00007969244,0.000001127099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001062663,0.0001588461,0.00002781477,0.0001980403,0.00004088704,0.0002334599,0.0001566902,0.0006504747,0.0000028934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003617065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000254622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007584024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001374377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988526,0.0000269387,0.0003105954,0.0003512435,0.000251961,0.000206668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989227,0.00003693974,0.00007780264,0.0007764922,0.0001152786,0.00007077537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009371686,0.000112574,0.0005294239,0.00009124691,0.000001037376,3.338277e-7,0.0003112245,0.1331318,0.8590459,0.00004077188,0.00003041553,0.006611666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582945,0.00009028215,0.00003792813,0.0001772358,0.00002143531,0.000004620018,0.00001773015,0.9395677,0.05840969,0.001235242,0.000006160371,0.0001737191],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720701,0.00002702614,0.5270523,0.000003957346,0.0001442419,0.000189677,0.00001784042,0.0004103511,0.00008445398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8581662,0.000003428926,0.1416046,5.82254e-7,0.0001038812,0.00002493834,0.00005676185,0.00003923291,2.895366e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6477557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08001845276512715,"score_gpt":0.337557140410204,"score_spread":0.2575386876450769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}