{"id":"W2108372800","doi":"10.5006/1.3500829","title":"Comparison of Impressed Current Cathodic Protection Numerical Modeling Results with Physical Scale Modeling Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CORROSION","topic":"Non-Destructive Testing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Technical University of Nova Scotia; Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Physical modelling; Current (fluid); Scale (ratio); Scale model; Engineering; Environmental science; Electrical engineering; Chemistry; Aerospace engineering; Electrochemistry; Physics; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008358143,0.0006548507,0.0005745246,0.0007250583,0.0003962315,0.001147391,0.0009725518,0.0007953258,0.002958308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002614737,0.0002982483,0.000552485,0.0006369572,0.0004357263,0.001054551,0.0003818297,0.0006520284,0.0005923124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000971242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000950951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004525516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002291567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994779,0.00008118485,0.00006078557,0.00008295528,0.0002488985,0.00004824427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982331,0.0008062798,0.0001278848,0.0003757693,0.0004265734,0.00003034406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002118106,0.0002436679,0.005079682,0.0002140523,0.00002165718,0.0001177511,0.0001955928,0.9122713,0.03545704,0.003766285,0.001241654,0.04117962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002147869,0.00007835417,0.001610058,0.00001113152,0.000007137232,0.00002206745,0.00004772418,0.9800412,0.01663569,0.0003283301,0.001180541,0.00001622131],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7699488,0.0003207746,0.1949557,0.0005321844,0.0001166141,0.0002128487,0.001224293,0.00383196,0.02885686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660054,0.0001788898,0.03137799,0.00004613577,0.000008701031,0.0001692954,0.0005263514,0.0001467063,0.001540614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004525516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009896517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08001845276512715,"score_gpt":0.337557140410204,"score_spread":0.2575386876450769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}