{"id":"W2108457914","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0470","title":"A Rapid Outcomes Ascertainment System Improves the Quality of Prognostic and Pharmacogenetic Outcomes from Observational Studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","topic":"Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Observational study; Medicine; Data quality; Quality assurance; Exact test; Clinical trial; Data collection; Intensive care medicine; Oncology; Internal medicine; Statistics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4223532,0.001326368,0.002735491,0.008775777,0.001470262,0.005989209,0.002748376,0.00180523,0.001119372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.607215,0.001499917,0.002263802,0.005999821,0.002321199,0.00373879,0.00701682,0.002806716,0.0005519163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003441299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004075687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002823151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5819851,0.3136827,0.05246455,0.02053458,0.02932294,0.002010109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1745252,0.5321974,0.09716199,0.1165213,0.0773394,0.002254734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002808401,0.0005559969,0.4983661,0.002514957,0.002030954,0.0002353496,0.003525598,0.02562557,0.00652455,0.01098726,0.0103499,0.4364753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003086698,0.003083261,0.5757672,0.003116063,0.002811282,0.001241668,0.0009609681,0.3034298,0.03903442,0.02321871,0.04346431,0.0007856451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1351072,0.001229543,0.8463469,0.003579938,0.0003277714,0.004822265,0.002248903,0.004079146,0.002258374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2386009,0.0003033491,0.7549626,0.000828252,0.0002495377,0.002689683,0.001756565,0.000288923,0.0003201616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5776469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7123414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.262492482599355,"score_gpt":0.4849340158107057,"score_spread":0.2224415332113507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}