{"id":"W2108477689","doi":"10.1109/tpwrd.2005.844283","title":"Optimal Calculation of Impedance of an Auxiliary Loop to Mitigate Magnetic Field of a Transmission Line","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","topic":"Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical conductor; Loop (graph theory); Transmission line; Magnetic field; Electric power transmission; Electrical impedance; Magnetic flux; Point (geometry); Characteristic impedance; Inner loop; Engineering; Transmission (telecommunications); Line (geometry); Control theory (sociology); Physics; Electrical engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007340752,0.0001262138,0.0002182197,0.000123223,0.00003892793,0.000004265889,0.0001125295,0.00004534852,0.0004520801],"category_scores_gemma":[5.844604e-7,0.0001232626,0.0001211256,0.0001846453,0.00003390394,0.0001176836,9.5488e-7,0.000116431,0.000005970247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001232458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004859045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001725615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000441951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990956,0.00003427395,0.0003562268,0.0001820564,0.0001658397,0.0001659859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994544,0.00005448136,0.00008347492,0.0002228923,0.00009070295,0.00009407118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005585876,0.001176164,0.00006970658,0.00004993546,0.00007990207,7.127192e-7,0.002336604,0.1552872,0.5968148,0.00009439746,0.00008501616,0.243447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007424124,0.002872106,0.0003468304,0.0001002911,0.00007980006,0.000001030469,0.00009766575,0.02355919,0.9718187,0.0000672187,0.0001502004,0.0001644828],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7727728,0.00005531395,0.2263214,0.0001133305,0.00005431086,0.0001226863,0.0000354148,0.00001135914,0.0005133541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948253,0.000006993815,0.00470725,0.00003734331,0.00002803016,0.000009899934,0.000004292416,0.00001332445,0.0003675352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.375004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5026503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005701060697650997,"score_gpt":0.2373026817613647,"score_spread":0.2316016210637137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}