{"id":"W2108622598","doi":"10.1007/s00466-008-0274-2","title":"A fast multipole boundary element method for 2D multi-domain elastostatic problems based on a dual BIE formulation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Mechanics","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Boundary element method; Computational Science and Engineering; Dual (grammatical number); Multipole expansion; Fast multipole method; Mathematics; Boundary knot method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Singular boundary method; Boundary (topology); Mathematical analysis; Domain decomposition methods; Element (criminal law); Finite element method; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Structural engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005561305,0.0006218099,0.001144101,0.0006694526,0.0005028103,0.0008510987,0.001484221,0.001751279,0.005390288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001235342,0.0005263835,0.000546856,0.0005818071,0.0004254648,0.001130678,0.001435276,0.001547688,0.002657305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002082021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005519429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007519037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997091,0.00006856969,0.00001149547,0.00002212037,0.0001717516,0.00001708887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995865,0.0001603973,0.00002508505,0.00004955938,0.0001383739,0.00004001937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002532532,0.0003244828,0.0006053656,0.0006046221,0.0001041968,0.0002959608,0.0003239334,0.443487,0.07807685,0.1422054,0.0100304,0.3236887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000181752,0.00002254419,0.00005802534,0.00001591683,0.000005626076,0.00006782795,0.00001404208,0.9864911,0.001952046,0.00486911,0.006473071,0.00001254809],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001624501,0.00007486732,0.9963769,0.00007038596,0.00006627812,0.00002840714,0.00003234682,0.0001662399,0.001559983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03385787,0.0001597639,0.9607264,0.0001440335,0.00004355763,0.0002150028,0.0001677276,0.000269746,0.004415766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005390288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01803231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01966340800778065,"score_gpt":0.2749567884871608,"score_spread":0.2552933804793802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}